Interview Sample Questions


1. Tell us about yourself.

2. Why do you want to pursue management as a career? (Justify with reasons)

3. What are your career objectives? (both long term & short term)

4. What do you feel about your academic performance till now?

5. Which is your favorite subject? (Be prepared for question in this area)

6. How do you spend your leisure time/spare time?

7. One significant achievement in your Life till now. Elaborate why?

8. What are your strengths and weaknesses?

9. What would you do if you do not get selected to any of the management schools?

10. Who is your idol? (Be prepared for further questions)

11. Why should I select you?

12. What is management, define it?

13. Which branch of management do you want to join? Define that branch and why do you want to go for this branch only?

14. Your previous background and now what are you doing at present and what you have done?

15. If you are from any background/Science/Commerce/Arts/Engineering/. Then why do you want to go for management, when there are already better prospect in it?

16. Your strong/weak points, how you got to know about it. How is your strong points going to help become a good manager. Don't you think your strong points is , your weak points and Don't you think your weak points can be hurdle for becoming a good manager.

17. What do you consider yourself after two months/two years/5 years/10 years

18. What is your ultimate career fantasy?

19. What will be your contribution to our institute?

20. What will be your reaction if you are rejected?

21. Your hobbies/interests.

22. Special achievement if any and why?

23. Worst moment of your life and why?

24. Best moment of your life and why?

25. Why this institute only?

26. Work experience if any detail?

27. Have you read any book (general/management)

a) Brief
b) Morale
c) How this book is going to help you in becoming a better manager.

Group Discussion Assement Matrix

CRITERIA
POINTS
SCORE
CRITERIA
POINTS
SCORE

1.INITIATIVE:

-Holds group's attention
-Forceful, yet persuasive and convincing

10
-
-is listened to indifferently by the group
-Makes feeble entry
-unable to conclude argument effectively
10
-
2.KNOWLEDGE:
-Has his acts right
-Bring in relevant and original points


10
-
-Lacks knowledge of the topic
-Causes discussion to go off at a tangent
10
-
3. CONTRIBUTION
-Adequate, comes in often
-Consistency, Reasoning
-Sustained to the end

7
-

-Inadequate, speaks just to do his duty

-Agrees or disagrees in short abrupt sentences

7
-
4. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
- Put across ideas fulently and effectively
-Listens attentively

7
-
-Linguistic skills poor
-Uninterested, not alive to what is going on
7
-
5.POISE
-Is relaxed
-Pleasant and friendly

6
-
-Is tense and fidgety
-Shows peculiar idiosyncrasies of speech and manner
6
-
TOTAL
40

TOTAL
40




Assessment Criteria

1. INITIATIVE

POSITIVE

NEGATIVE

-Enters in a measured manner and at the correct moment

- Holds the audience by being forceful, yet persuasive and convincing

- Concludes each argument at the right time and manner

-makes a feeble entry

-Becomes unnecessarily aggressive

-Does not wait for the correct opportunity to make his point.

-Very hesitant about his point of view

-Attempts to force down his point of view

--Is abrupt in his-exit

-gets too long drawn out

-falters or loses his confidence

-misses his original pointer argument along the way.

2. KNOWLEDGE

POSITIVES

NEGATIVE

-Has his facts right and shows depth of understanding of the subject

-Shows shallow understanding

-Reiterates wrong facts

-Bombards others with data and confuses the issues at hand.

3. VALUE ADDITION TO THE GROUP

POSITIVE
NEGATIVE

-Consistently makes points that enhance the quality of the discussion

-Makes original points that steer the group into discussing other angles to the topic

-Takes the discussion on a tangent by adding irrelevant points

-Harps on small point and therefore obscures the critical issues.

-Agrees/Disagrees without justification

-Shows distinctly uncooperative attitude to the group efforts at discussion.

4. PARTICIPATION
POSITIVE
NEGATIVE

-Comes in often

-Is sustained his participation

-Shows interest in the group's activities

-Shows interest or involvement in spurts

-Displays disinterest or disdain for group's efforts

-Speaks only to do his duty

-Makes his presence felt unnecessaril

Doubts/FAQ on Group Discussion

USUAL DOUBTS THAT STUDENTS HAVE AND THEIR ANSWERS


1. Are we allowed to carry a piece of paper during the G.D. for noting down some important points?
Ans.- Normally you are allowed to carry a pieces of paper, but there might be some instance where you are specifically forbidden to.

2. Is there any particular seating arrangement, which is favorable to the participant?
Ans- If participants are asked to sit in a circle or a semicircle, one position is as good as any other. But if you are asked to sit on either side of a rectangular table, then try to chosen a position as close to the center as possible.

3. Should we begin the G.D. by appointing a leader amongst ourselves?
Ans- No, you should not. Leadership in a G.D is established implicity through one' s performance in the GD.

4. Should we distribute the total time available to all the participants to ensure those everyday gets a chance to speak?
Ans- Since a G.D is not like a debate or elocution, the participants should not resort to he strategy of distributing time amongst themselves.

5. Can we take a definite stand right away and them later on during the G.D switch over to the other side of the argument?
Ans- Yes, provided you do it in the right way. In a G.D it is quite likely that some other participant’s counter-argument convinces you to your point. If this happens, then it is best if you accept his argument and explain to the group how your previous argument was true within a narrow range, and how the new argument is applicable to a broader range. Naturally, it is safer not to make any rash statements for or against the topic before you learn the facts of the arguments. Blindly taking a stand will definitely lead you into trouble. This does not mean that you should sit on the fence. You may participate actively by pointing out issue on both sides of the argument in a reasonable and logical manner.

6. If we do not understand the meaning of the topic, should we ask the moderator to explain it to us?
Ans - No, You cannot ask the moderator the meaning of the topic. Instead of displaying your ignorance in this manner, it is better to wait for some other participant to explain the meaning of the topic. So listen to the discussion carefully for the first three or four minutes, and when you have gained some idea about the topic, participate in the discussions.

7. Should we address the other participants by their names or by their assigned numbers?
Ans - As far as possible, you should avoid the use of names or numbers. It is better to use pronouns such as 'he', ‘she’, 'you', etc, while referring to the other members of your group.

8. Are we expected to stick to the normally accepted line of thought or can we come up with something radical?
Ans-In a G.D, your creativity in thinking is very important. This means that you are supposed to come up with ideas and convince the group about the workability of your idea. There is no defined norm about ideas, other than that; they should be relevant to the topic.

9. If I feel strongly about an issue, should I voice my feelings?
Ans - There are many topics, which you may feel deeply about. However, it is important to be cool and emotionally stable during a G.D If you let yourself get involved at a personal level with the topic, or react emotionally o statements of other participants, you are likely to lose control over yourself during the G.D Remember that while it is important to say what you feel, it is equally important to be able to speak in a calm and logical manner.

10. Can I use technical terms or jargon, which is clear to me, but not to the group?
Ans- If you have to use technical terms, then please do not use abbreviations. After mentioning the term in full, take time off to explain to the group what it means. It is quite likely that the members of your group have a different academic background and are not conversant with the jargon that you use.

11. Do I begin my participation by requesting the group's permission to do so?
Ans- At times when the group is very orderly, you could start off by asking permission to present your case. But when the G.D is noisy (which is usually the case), do not waste times in formalities. First, nobody will be willing to give you a chance and second, it could also go against you (as lack of initiative on your part).

12. Which is the right time to enter a G.D to ensure that I am heard properly?
Ans-In any G.D, there are crests and troughs during the discussion. At a crest, the noise level is the maximum and at a trough there is almost total silence. Ideally, you should enter the G.D during the trough period. But normally in competitive Gds., the crests occur more often and for more prolonged periods. Troughs, if they do come, last for very little time, In such cases, you could identify those stages in the G.D where ideas dear/familiar to you are being discussed and enter the G.D irrespective of the noise level. The logic here is that you might never be able to identify a trough and even after identifying, might never be able to enter effectively then. Since being silent is not of much help, perhaps by participating at a noisy stages, you might gain some points at least.

13. How do I participate when the noise level is too high?
Ans- As explained above, if the noise level is high you have two options-remain silent, or join in by raising your voice to be heard above the din. At times it is not possible to speak loudly because of the nature of voice. At such times, identify the most powerful speaker in the group and note down the point he/she is making. The moments the noise level lessons even a little enter by supporting the most powerful speaker. You will have made a strong ally who will ally who will aid you and pull you through noisy situations.

14. Do I have to be cautious about other participants' feeling (on sensitive issues like religion, caste, etc.)?
Ans-Yes, you must. Running down others by arguing on religious practices and caste differences displays your viciousness and lack of maturity. Remember that you will end up sounding like an irrational and biased person. This is also true for touchy topics such as abortion, sexual discriminations, euthanasia etc.

15. Is it beneficial to be the first speaker in a group discussion?
Ans-If you can make a positive and confident start by speaking for at least 20-30 seconds at a stretch, then it would be advantageous. This is because the first speaker is normally expected to provide direction to the G.D If the job is property done, then the first speaker automatically becomes the leader of the group and his/her opening idea remains alive throughout the G.D

16. How critical is fluency in English to my performance in the G.D?
Ans-Command over the language and good grammar definitely aids you in enhancing your performance. A lack of ideas may be partly covered up by your skills in speaking, but not fully. If you are not fluent, or if you have to struggle to express your thoughts, you need to present very strong ideas to attract attention. Knowledge rather than speech become your mainstay. If you are able to communicate with the group by some means or the other, than fluency is not critical.

17. How necessary is it to use examples for illustrating an idea?
Ans-Please remember that examples by themselves do not prove anything. The use of example is helpful in elaborating your point, because people are able to understand your better. They associate better with your example than with your point.

18. How much and for how long should I participants?
Ans-In a 20 minute G.D with 12-15 participants, you should participate at least 4 times with each entry lasting for at least 20-25 seconds. You could participate more depending upon your comfort level and the need for participation.

19. How important is the use of body language in a G.D?
Ans-Use of proper body language is an advantage. Some of the ways in which you could use your body effectively are:
-Have significant eye contact. Look at the G.D members when you speak to them. Keep moving your eyes all around so that you focus on the whole group and not on specific individuals.
-Keep your body upright, and lean forward while speaking or listening. This will show your sustained interest in the G.D
- If you agree with somebody, nod your head, so that the speaker realises that your understand him.
- Use your hands effectively to emphasis your statements and to persuade others to listen to you do not gesture wildly, but use your hands as a means of communications.
- Do not place you hand in front of your mouth while speaking. It inhibits speech and shows self-consciousness.
- Do not use your arm to support your chin. It communicates a lack of interest in the G.D - Do not point your finger or pen at a person aggressively. These are intimidator tactics and will be a recognised as such.
- Keep your hands on the table when you are not using them to emphasis you points. If you tend to keep your hands moving then you might end up distracting others?
- Do not sit cross-legged during a discussions. A cross-legged position is for relaxation and not good for competitive situations.

20. Is it good to be humorous in a G.D?
Ans- In a relaxed type of G.D, which is not very competitive, humor is acceptable. But in a competitive G.D, your attempts at humor may fall flat. Other members of the G.D are likely to be tense, or thinking seriously about what to speak, and will be in mood to laugh.

21. Is it necessary to make an interim summary?
Ans- An interim summary is a way of directing the group mid-way through the G.D It helps the group pick out and focus on the most important points and thus use the remaining time effectively. However, it is not always necessary to make an interim summary, especially when the discussion already is well focused.

22. What do I do if someone else has already said that I wanted to say?
Ans- You have two choices:
- Agree with the point made by your colleague and add on to it by displaying the applicability of the argument to different situations. By doing this you will have broadened the scope of the argument.
- Drop the point and think of something new to say.
If possible try to avoid this situation by speaking in the first 4-5 minutes of the G.D, when new points are being introduced. If you wait a long time to speak, someone else would most probably have covered ‘your ‘ point.

23. Is the use of slang/colloquialism permitted?
Ans- Generally not. For two reasons-first that it is bad English, and second, that other members of the group may not understand it.

24. Can I use a language other than English at any time to drive home my point?
Ans- No, You will have to stick on English.

25. How is aggression measured and judged in a G.D?
Ans-The moment people start reacting to your negatively and strongly, you may take it that you are being too aggressive. The degree of reaction is the measure of your aggressiveness.

26. What level of aggression is permissible?
Ans-There is a very thin line separating aggression and assertiveness. You should be aggressive enough to sound assertive, but aggression in excess of this will make you sound stubborn and inciter.

27. Is it true that the person who speaks the most in a G.D is bound to be the most successful?
Ans- This is a myth. Generally, a person who has sound knowledge about the topic and is clear thinker tends to speak more. This leads students to wrongly believe that success is directly proportional to the amount you speak. Just speaking for the sake of speaking will not take you far.

28. Will I be quizzed in my interview about my participation in the G.D?
Ans- If the interview immediately follows the G.D, then this is likely to happen. You may be asked to rate the performance of all members in the G.D, or to state your opinion on the topic etc.

29. Is it true that the G.D is used more as an elimination technique than as a selection tool?
Ans-In institute other than the IIMs, during the preliminary stages of selections, the G.D is uses as an elimination technique. In the final stages of the selection process, it is used to actively select, rather than to discard. This is because most of the elimination has been done at the earlier stage already. At the IIMs, since there are no such stages, the G.D is used to select and not to eliminate.

30. What is the level of accuracy desired in the facts and figures that you quote in a G.D?
Ans-An error margin of 5% on the higher/lower side is permitted.

31.Is motivating other persons in a group to participate looked upon favorably?
Ans- If you try to motivate people by openly requesting them to speak then it might not be acceptable. You might be forcing someone to talk at the expense of the other members of the group. Also, the person who you are helping may not really want to speak at that point. It is therefore better to use other methods of motivation, These including agreeing with halting speakers, adding on to their points, implicate supporting them and giving them direction, etc.

32. Does the moderator have any biases or preconceived notions about the topic?
Ans- Ideally the moderate is supposed to be unbiased and neutral. But being a human being, the moderator may not be totally free from bias. The moderator may feel strongly about a topic and your views could differ from his. If you are good participants, this will not seriously affect your chances of getting selected.

33. Can we expect the moderator to stop or cut short the G.D much before the stipulated time is over?
Ans-At times if the G.D becomes chaotic, or the level of discussion deteriorates abysmally, the moderator might cut short the G.D

34. Can I be aggressive with lady participants?
Ans- Being rude in a G.D (to any member) is downright unacceptable. But being aggressive (within acceptable limits) is entirely OK, with both male and female members of the groups. A G.D is not place for excessive gallantry.

35. Is it OK to ask pointed questions of the group members?
Ans- While you may ask for some clarifications from others members during a G.D, remember that you should not play the Devil’s advocate. Some participants question regularly the statements of the group members (with the aim of proving them wrong) and are difficult to convince. By playing the Devil’s Advocate such a participant obstructs the smooth flow of the G.D and does not allows the topic to progress. The pointed questions that he/she asks unsettle the other members, and the quality of the G.D deteriorates. The moderator would hold such a tedious inquisitor responsible for this, and would judge him/her badly.

36. Is it necessary that the group should arrive at a conclusion in the stipulated time?
Ans- In the ideal case, the group is expected to reach a conclusion. Normally the time constraint does not allow the group to do so. Where not all points have been discussed, and there is need for further discussion, the group may continue if it wishes, without a conclusion or a consensus.

37. Is an end-summary absolutely essential?
Ans- No, If the group has not reached any conclusion then it would be good if somebody puts the whole discussion in perspective by summarizing. But if there is not enough time, a summary may be avoided.

38. How are listening skills evaluated in a G.D?
Ans- A participant displays his/her listening skills by doing any of the following:
-Reaching time and again to arguments presented by the other members.
-Recollecting tie ideas and summarizing at different points in the G.D
-Connecting the various arguments presented at come up with something more meaningful -Constantly looking at the person who is speaking and not looking disinterested
-Nodding the head in agreements or disagreement with ideas presented during the G.D

39. Do we have to write a synopsis of the G.D once it is over?
Ans-Some institutes insist on this; but it is not universal.

40. Is voting an acceptable method of reaching a consensus?
Ans- No, As far as possible, try to avoid this.

41. What is the acceptable performance level of a G.D?
Ans- The scoring in a G.D is relative. Generally, participants are marked on a scale of 0-10 with weight ages assigned for individual elements. If the consolidated score for the best participants in the G.D is very high, the other participants will be judged against this score. Normally a cut-off score is established and all those who score above this are selected. If the level of a G.D is very low, and the highest score is below the cut-off, then all members of the G.D are rejected.

42. How should a group select a topic if asked to?
Ans-The group should brainstorm for about two minutes and narrow down the list of topics to about 3 or 4. After his the group should prioritize them based on the comfort level and ease of discussion of the topics. Asking each participant to rank the 4 topics could do this, and the most popular choice should be taken.

43. What is the normal duration of G.D?
Ans-About 20-25 minutes at the IIMs.

44. How many students are usually clubbed in one group discussion?
Ans-The number varies between 10 & 15

45. How many panel members will be there?
Ans- Normally 2 or 3

46. How appropriate is it to act a co-ordinator in a G.D?
Ans-The role of a co-ordinator is usually played by a person who is senior in rank or designation to the other members, In a company Board meeting for example, the Chairman or CEO co-ordinates. In a G.D, since all the participants are to be treated as equal in rank, playing the coordinator is not advisable.

47. Are the topics decided on the basis of the academic background of the participant?
Ans-No. Topics are usually general in nature. They may be based on some current event or some issue of general interest.

48. What do I do if one member is very stubborn/aggressive?
Ans-You could use any one of the following methods: Ignore him and address other members of the group. Be assertive with him and collectively tell him that his argument is faulty Point out to him that his point is well taken and the group must progress further by discussing the ideas being presented by others.

49. What are the acceptable ways of interrupting somebody else, so that I may make my point?
Ans- You can interrupt in any of the following ways: By saying “Excuse me, but I feel that what you are saying is not totally true...” By raising your voice and making the other participants clam up halfway through By saying “ Yes, I agree with your idea, and I would like to add on it.......” By asking for some clarification from the speaker on the point which he is making at that moment. 50. Can my G.D performances be improved through training? Yes, G.D performances can be improved by training oneself in the following areas: Creative Thinking Fluent Communication Proper Presentation Personal and Inter-personal Dynamics.

Group Discussion Agenda

THE VALUE OF AN AGENDA (applicable to discussions based on case-studies) For any type of formal discussion, there must be an agenda or method for handling business . Without a basic structure for discussions, it is unlikely that a group will conduct the kind of systematic thorough investigation necessary for wise decision making. Wood, Phillips and Pederson in their book on Group Discussion have talked about a standard agenda for a group discussion. It is as follows :

1. Understanding the charge: Why is the group in existence? What is it to do? What form does its output take ? What is to be done with it?

2. Understanding and phrasing the question : What precisely is the group to examine or inquire about? What do the words in question mean? Are all the technical words and issues clear to the members?

3. Fact Finding: What are the symptoms of the problems? What is the cause of the symptoms? What is happening that should not be happening? What is not happening that should be happening? Who is suffering from the situation? How badly ? What will happen if the situation is not remedied? How much the question be modified in light of fact finding?

4. Setting criteria and Limitations: What is possible (as opposed to what is desirable) What are the legal, moral, financial, practical and logistical limits on decision making? What would a solution look like? What would be happening that is not happening now? What will stop happening?

5. Discovering and selecting solutions: What are the alternatives? How does each meet the goals? How do they measure up against the limitations? Which provide more of what is wanted with the least now harm? Which one should be selected? Who is to do what about what, when, and where, with what projected effect and how will it be paid for? What evaluation plan can be measure the effectiveness of the solution?

6. Preparing and presenting the final report: What must be written down? What must be said? When, where and to whom? How can the final report be most persuasively presented?

Important Factors for Group Discussion

Important Factors for Group Discussion

In order to be able to take part in a successful group discussion it is necessary to understand the elements to understand the elements/ features of interaction. They are :

1. Verbal Communication : This feature is arguably the single most important influence on how a group operates and what it achieves. Talking and listening are the substance of problem solving. However, the quality of talk cannot be gauged merely by the level of participation. While it is true that in most cases productive group members are the ones who talk the most, at certain time conversational bullies and time wasters too take up a lot of time. Furthermore, a focus on talking alone does not take into account the importance of listening. Both quality and quantity of participation are important and listening too is recognized as an integral part of communication. Relatively equal participation of all members is necessary so that
(a) maximum ideas are brought up and discussed
(b) This leads to greater satisfaction amongst group members
(c) Finally if there has been effective participation the likelihood of a consensus is also higher.

2. Non- Verbal Behavior : Non - verbal messages which are sent without or in addition to words form a major part of communication. Behaviors of face and gestures of the hands and body can very easily befriend or antagonize others. This is true because 65 to 90 percent of emotional meaning is transmitted through non- verbal messages. Facial gestures, physical position, eye contact and tone of voice indicate feelings and levels of interest. For example, boredom is suggested when a member turns away or looks aside when someone else is speaking. Conversely keen interest is indicated by a member who sits erect, faces the speaker, and maintains direct eye contact. Sometimes non- verbal clues are complete messages in themselves. A nod of the head signifies agreement whereas shaking of the head signifies disagreement

3. Norms an Conformity: Norms are standardized patterns of belief, attitude, communication, and behavior within groups and grow out of member association. What would be the norms of a group discussion? Certain norms of individual behavior such as being polite, listening to others points of view, not being too overbearing, giving people a fair chance to participate, etc. should be kept in mind.

4. Power : In the organizational situation, power comes from occupying a position in the hierarchy. Power can also be earned by a demonstration of efficiency and competence in the discussion. It is important to note that all members in our situation have the same amount of power to begin with. But during the course of the discussion some members earn more power by their ability to contribute more meaningfully thereby gathering the support of others.

The advantage of having power in a group discussion is that powerful members (those who have earned more power) are the centers of communications in a group - they talk more, and most importantly, other talk more to them than to people with lesser power, There seems to be a reciprocal relationship between participation's and power. Interaction of forces within a group system renders peoples with little power to unable to participate, which makes them even more marginal until they break off from the group or become hostile to it. This harms the group as it eliminates a potential contributor.

5. Cohesion: This refers to team orientation and the feeling of "we-ness rather than 'one-ness'. Generally groups should pull together and agree on major issues such as the 'nature of the task' and the 'goals' they hope to achieve. The options on how to go about achieving these 'goals' may differ and each alternative may be discussed at length but when a goal has to be reached and everyone is clear on that, it will ultimately be arrived at. Cohesion can come about only when
(a) members are willing to sacrifice personal opinions to uphold group norms
(b) there are shared needs, interests and goals.

6. Decision making styles: There are three distinct ways by which decision can be made.
a) Consensus: It means a unanimous agreement by all members. This form of decision making will, in all probability, not be possible in a situation such as ours as it requires too much time (which is not available to us) and may also involve too many compromises (which again may not be healthy).
b) Negotiation: It involves bargaining among members to build a solution that honors each person’s position on particular issues. This form of decision making is less time consuming and makes bolder decision, as all members need not fully agree with the decision. One drawback is that there is a tendency to arrive at piecemeal solutions.
c) Voting: The obvious advantage of such a decision making process is its efficiency. It is the quickest and most decisive way of settling issues. However, voting may Create divisions, polarizing winners and losers and generating resentment and frustrations.

GUIDELINES FOR GROUP DISCUSSION

GUIDELINES FOR GROUP DISCUSSION

Group Discussions requires that a number of persons with different ideas and points of view come together and talk in order to solve a problem they have in common. To make a group discussion effective the following points have to be kept in mind.

1. Discussions must be GOAL DIRECTED. Any Group Discussion is an exercise intended to accomplish some goal that the individual acting alone could not attain. The effectiveness of a Group Discussion is measured not only by the quality and quantity of individual participation's but also by the fact that whether the group as a whole has been able to reach some sort of consensus on the issue at hand.

2. Every member must be RESPONSIBLE for the group effectiveness. Too often it happens that certain non-participants start abdicating personal responsibility to contribute to the outcome. Simply by not participating, they permit people with total Italian ldeas to takeover a democratic process. Whenever a group member decides to escape the responsibility of making a decision he not only impairs the effectiveness of the group but also loses out in the bargain.

3. Every members must aim for COOPERATION rather than CONFLICT and should have a positive ATTITUDE. Conflict, provided it is healthy should never be avoided as it helps to looks at a problem from various angles and come up with alternatives. Therefore whenever conflicting view points arise, active participation's and a positive attitude should resolve them. In a Group Discussion, it is O.K. to disagree so long as one is not disagreeable. Every decision need not be arrived at by consensus. There are bound to be times when groups will have to bargains and come to a negotiated settlement: at times, It may even be necessary to vote.


4. An effective discussion requires leadership.

This problem is resolved easily when the group consists of persons known to each other and working in the same organization. The hierarchy usually decides the leader. But in a situation such as ours, where we may be seeing each other for the first time, this part of deciding on a leader, to monitor and guide the discussion, is very difficult. It has however, been noticed that once the discussion on a particular issue starts, a leader normally emerges who takes it upon himself to guide the Group Discussion. The ideal thing to do for such a person (since he has not elected and has no formal powers of a leader) would be to act as a facilitator and ensure a smooth flow of ideas and information.

An effective discussion will logically lead to and effective decision. The effectiveness of a groups final product is after all, the bottom line in evaluating the groups success. According to Maier the formula for an effective decision is :
ED = Q X A
Effective Decision = Quality X Acceptance

Quality is measured by objective information such as problem situation, cost of implementation, creative problem solving ideas etc. Acceptance refers to the degree to which the decision garners commitment from those who implement and work with it. It would mean the extent to which an individual believes in the decisions taken by the group.

TOPICS FOR GROUP DISCUSSION

Popular TOPICS FOR GROUP DISCUSSION
  1. Euthanasia should be legalized.
  2. The role of press advertising has diminished with the advent of TV.
  3. India does not need OKE but cheaper rice.
  4. The opportunities and challenges facing India in a unipolar world.
  5. India needs a benevolent dictator for the next five years.
  6. There should be compulsory sterilization after the first child.
  7. India should review its nuclear option in the light of the recent utterances of Benazir Bhutto.
  8. Nelson Mandela - Fighting a bigger battle.
  9. Film Censorship should be abolished.
  10. Voting age for Indians should not be lowered to 18 years.
  11. Students must take active interest in politics.
  12. In order to check AIDS sex with foreigners and NRIs should be banned.
  13. The government should nationalize foreign banks
  14. Prohibition should be enforced throughout the country
  15. Capital punishment should be abolished.
  16. Art cinema is India lacks entertainment value.
  17. Cricket is a waste of national resource.
  18. Yesterdays man was a finance man, toadies is a marketing man, tomorrow's will be an HRD man.
  19. Communism is irrelevant in today’s world.
  20. Use of drugs in sports is justified.
  21. India cannot afford a sporting extravaganza like Olympics.
  22. In order to check brain drain, IIT graduates should be made to sign a bond to serve for five years in the country.
  23. Religion based political parties should be banned.
  24. India should cut her defence expenditure.
  25. Reservations for SC/STs is necessary for their upliftment.
  26. Our education system has drove ineffective.
  27. India should follow a two-party system like the U.S.
  28. The world is a sager place today as compared to two years ago.
  29. India should review its politics towards Israel.
  30. The Indian Army should reoccupy POK.
  31. With the lowest industry growth rate since Independence, India’s liberalization policy has been proved ineffective.
  32. One man’s terrorist is another’s martyr.
  33. What India needs most is a presidential form of government?
  34. Corruption is a necessary evil for success is any sphere.
  35. Modern English education has alienated the Indian youth from the mainstream of the country’s life.
  36. Work experience must be a pre-requisite for management education.
  37. Modern management education is a perfect example of old wine in new bottles.
  38. Public sector in India is a while elephant.
  39. Unity in India is a myth.
  40. Communism is for the poor, capitalism is for the rich.
  41. There is life after death.
  42. Women’s liberation is nothing but bra-burning.
  43. Use of guinea pigs for medical research must be banned.
  44. Politics is the last refuge of the uneducated scoundrel.
  45. Art is a four lettered word.
  46. The Islamic bomb will lead to world peace.
  47. Advertising is a wasteful expenditure.
  48. Exploitation of the female anatomy should be banned in advertising.
  49. Love marriage is the best form of marriage.
  50. There must be some controls for the Indian press today.
  51. Doordarshan must be made autonomous.
  52. There should be compulsory army enlisting for every male citizen of the country.
  53. A wise man is he who prepares his wife for widowhood.
  54. Capitalism and communism are in the process of merging together to form a new politico economic order.
  55. Sex education should be made compulsory from high school onwards.
  56. Ragging is a necessary evil.
  57. The biggest problem-confronting mankind today is….
  58. Destruction of this planet earlier than expected would be due to a faulty basic premise in economic called “growth”.
  59. Professional sportsmen/athletics should be allowed to participate in the Olympics.
  60. Burgeoning growth of metros like Bombay can be stopped only be removing the slums.
  61. Value based political has no place in Indian politics.
  62. Drug peddlers should be sentenced to death.
  63. Doordarshan and Air should be privatized.
  64. Indian capital markets have come a long way.
  65. Yesterday’s was a joint family, today’s a nuclear family, and tomorrow’s will be a ‘no family’.
  66. Religion is the root cause of all evils in India.
  67. Indian film industry is on its death bed.
  68. Screening of cigarette and liquor ads should be allowed on TV.
  69. Income tax should be banned to avoid tax evasion.
  70. India should align with the U.S. to accelerate industrial growth.
  71. Democracy in India is nothing but civilized monarchy.
  72. Increasing automation is the only key to industrial growth in India.
  73. Only God can save India.
  74. Cow slaughter must be banned in India.
  75. Sale of gold to the public must be stopped to prevent wastage of national resources.
  76. Art is a four letter word.
  77. Lip, Lip & Away.
  78. When Red sees Red he turns Red.
  79. Women Reservation.
  80. Conversion: Necessary Evil.
  81. Visit of Clinton: Myth of reality.
  82. How to check Hijacking.
  83. Budget 99-2000 (Myth or reality).
  84. Future of Coalition Govts.
  85. Match fixing: We are responsible.
  86. Only cons is change.
  87. Which is best branch of Mgmt.
  88. Solution is Pakistan.
  89. Democracy or Democracy in India.
  90. Legalise Corruption.

Most Recent Post